• thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Elections are in some way a validation of the system. The elites point to the election any time someone complains about some policy. The entire system has been consistently getting worse regardless of who is in power for at least 30+ years. The only way we have to express our displeasure is to vote out the incumbent. I’m confident that even if Kamala had won, things would have gotten worse. Maybe they would be worse at a slower rate, but they would be worse. We need to see beyond electoral politics. Every time you vote, you are granting the rich permission to continue to removed you regardless of who you voted for.

    • Soupbreaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Every time you vote, you are granting the rich permission to continue to removed you regardless of who you voted for.

      And do you think that, by refraining from voting, you would somehow deny the rich that permission? That’s probably why all the openly corrupt, unapologetically authoritarian politicians go out of their way to ensure everyone is able to cast a ballot, right? Because they know that, the more people vote, the more permission the rich will have to removed everyone. That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for your enlightened contribution here.