• AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    OK, but she didn’t have time to run a better campaign because a lot of influential people (Harris included) in the Democratic party decided it was better to hide Biden’s deteriorating condition than confront it.

    Does this seem like the actions of a party that genuinely considers Trump an existential threat?

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Does it matter? By voting 3rd party or abstaining you didn’t hurt the DNC. It hurt everyone else in the country and in other countries we provided aid to. Cuba and Venezuela too.

      The presidential election isn’t the time for protest voting when the opposition is literally telling you that you won’t ever get to vote again.

      You want to hurt the DNC? Do it in the primaries.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Does this seem like the actions of a party that genuinely considers Trump an existential threat?

        Does it matter?

        OK, so we’re gonna quibble over 3rd party voters again, and just dismiss the fact that DNC leadership doesn’t take this seriously. Great.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          So do you think abstaining or protest voting 3rd party made them take it seriously? Did they change their tune when they lost? Do you honestly think the country is better for Trump beating Harris?

          I’m not saying the DNC is flawless; I think it needs to go down in flames. But I’m also not stupid and understand the concept of prioritization.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            The only way to actually reform the DNC is to elect an outsider even if they are more likely to lose the general election.

                • village604@adultswim.fan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Then I agree with you. The primaries are where the stand should take place, but after that you’re stuck with two viable options.

                  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 days ago

                    I think in most part that’s correct unless a party hits below 25% polling for some reason (at that point its actually a good idea to support third parties). I also think we should make more efforts to get some sort of proportional voting system to replace the current, shitty first past the post system.