“Telegram is not a private messenger. There’s nothing private about it. It’s the opposite. It’s a cloud messenger where every message you’ve ever sent or received is in plain text in a database that Telegram the organization controls and has access to it”

“It’s like a Russian oligarch starting an unencrypted version of WhatsApp, a pixel for pixel clone of WhatsApp. That should be kind of a difficult brand to operate. Somehow, they’ve done a really amazing job of convincing the whole world that this is an encrypted messaging app and that the founder is some kind of Russian dissident, even though he goes there once a month, the whole team lives in Russia, and their families are there.”

" What happened in France is they just chose not to respond to the subpoena. So that’s in violation of the law. And, he gets arrested in France, right? And everyone’s like, oh, France. But I think the key point is they have the data, like they can respond to the subpoenas where as Signal, for instance, doesn’t have access to the data and couldn’t respond to that same request.  To me it’s very obvious that Russia would’ve had a much less polite version of that conversation with Pavel Durov and the telegram team before this moment"

  • sifar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    That’s absurd coming from the founder of a FOSS messaging app who actively decided not to let Signal federate and rejected any other open source Signal client. Not only that, even now you can’t truly use Signal’s new “username” feature. If any of the recipients have your number stored in their phonebook, irrespective of whether you know them or not, the username goes for a toss. This was/is the problem with Telegram’s username feature. Signal knew this and still decided to go ahead with it. Not to mention never doing anything about completely removing the phone number from the account after its creation. This has been, by design, a privacy and hence safety threat, and even after the username feature was implemented, this not getting implemented is very concerning.

  • sqgl@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t understand his point about restoring your messages to a new phone. How does that prove it isn’t encrypted? Couldn’t Telegram store the encrypted data on their server, send the encrypted data back to you and then you automatically decrypt it because you have the key?

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    It should be the law that any information a online service collects about it’s users should be given to the government immediately and unconditionally, then suddenly people will start really caring about how much information a service has access to.

    • Bongles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      then suddenly people will start really caring about how much information a service has access to

      I sincerely doubt it. The majority of people will accept that this is just “how it is” and will move on with life. After all, they’re not doing anything wrong.

      • fxdave@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I agree, if majority of people would care, Linux PCs would be the most popular option. They care about convenience only, but not even that much. Instead of researching the best they are just ok with the advertised options. They eat what they get.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    You mean the messenger that requires you give them your phone number to make an account? Yeah, fuck that.

  • presoak@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    6 days ago

    She’s pretty hot for a programmer.

    And with a name like that she was destined for greatness.

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        7 days ago

        How I hate that saunas are associated with porn and sex. It’s not supposed to be sexual and more importantly it’s an awful, just terrible place to have sex

        • Markus29@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t know man, those benches are nice for a variety of positions. Plus, you are already naked…

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            7 days ago

            Just trust me on this one, 80’C+ room just isn’t the place for that sort of exercise. And it’s not like your heart rate isn’t up already lol. It’s a terrible experience

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                7 days ago

                I want you to actually try sauna sex and report back to me, if you don’t believe me. But don’t say I didn’t warn you lol