blehiscool
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
chigga@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 hours ago

CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT

lemmy.world

message-square
34
link
fedilink
485

CHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENT

lemmy.world

chigga@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 hours ago
message-square
34
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    We should go to war against corpocracy, until all corporations are bankrupt.

    EVERY. DAMN. ONE.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    they will keep trying in the most sneaky ways until they are deposed.

  • iamtherealwalrus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Where can I see who voted for and against? I want to know if I need to change who I vote for next EU election.

    • MoffKalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      Scroll down and select your country: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

      It’s always the ones you most expect.

    • chigga@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think that Patrick posted it. basically the ones against where the conservatives, both left and right where against (even if there were some people inside those parities who voted to continue the scanning)

      • WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For those of us out of the loop, who is Patrick?

        • kapulsa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Probably Patrick Breyer, who often posts about privacy issues in the EU parliament.

          https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/

          • WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Thanks!

        • dingleberrylover@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Definitely not a Krusty Krab

        • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          i think they mean patrick breyer from the german pirate party

  • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why was chat control allowed to be presented again in the first place.

    • chigga@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 hours ago

      this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.

      greedy corps going against law as usual.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, not really. It’s because they retracted the proposal before going to vote, because they knew it wouldnt pass after Germany publicly said they would vote against.

        Then they changed some stuff and send it again, which is now rejected as it seems.

        Now they need to wait, but they didnt before.

        • chigga@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          So this war is far from an end huh?

          • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 hours ago

            They won’t stop pushing until they get it

        • leagman1@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Who are they?

          • guy@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The Commission probably since they’re the only entity who can propose law

            • leagman1@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              How do I respond to this^^

              Yes, I think we’re all assuming the law came into parliament the regular way. I assumed the “they” are supposed lobbyists who are standing behind and outside the regular entity…

              Am I missing something or are you pulling a Nielsen on me? “Coffee?” “Yes, I know.”

              • guy@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Oh, sorry. Thought you actually didn’t knew, my bad!

  • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Let’s celebrate this victory… even though it’s concerning that it is a recurring topic :-/

  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Can it just fuck off for good this time?

    • chigga@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      PLEASE

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      it’s indicative of the system we’re in. our oligarchs have enough money to pay people to push for this in perpetuity while the rest of us are forced to give up some degree of our lives to fight it off on a field of battles that’s tilted towards money; they will win eventually unless the system itself is changed.

  • Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    see u all on monday

  • ceigid@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Will they just revote again then until it passes?

    • chigga@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      hopefully no. but we are still in danger

    • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is indeed the plan. Only 1 time is enough to this through the system. But it requires 500 times saying no first.

      • guy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        When the European Union is low-key IRA

        • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That would make us Margaret Thatcher, which is very gross

          • guy@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Well based on the seats in the parliament, most eu voters are rightwing to some degree. So it’s Tatcher going undercover IRA to bomb herself?

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They’ll just change a few things and try again. I feel like we’ve been hearing about chat control on and off for about 5 years now and I can’t imagine it’ll go away soon.

  • dustycups@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    About fucking time for some good news.

  • HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Saw this then scrolled more to see the EU going after porn sites for age verification. 😞

  • iByteABit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Good, but pretty meaningless overall while they still allow lobbying to take place.

    They pretend to care that lobbying means corruption from corporate interests, but doing anything meaningful to stop lobbying entirely and punish anyone still doing it would be “authoritarian communism” now, wouldn’t it?

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.77K users / day
  • 3.7K users / week
  • 7.49K users / month
  • 7.65K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 47.5K subscribers
  • 293 Posts
  • 5.12K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org