Betwixed and between

  • 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • while there might be some crazy people like that man of them have different options to the status quo and provide me with food for further thought. That doesn’t mean I agree with everything there, but that thay the same with any instance.

    i find how we are in this world isn’t because of the likes of the opinions on .ml bit the apathy and opinions of the average voter and citizen, so normal (as in under the bell curve) is the new crazy.

    an example

    Susan Sontag was asked what she had learned from the Holocaust, and she said that 10% of any population is cruel, no matter what, and that 10% is merciful, no matter what, and that the remaining 80% could be moved in either direction.” — Kurt Vonnegut

    this is the US now for example…

    i wanted an instance that wasn’t defederated from them.
















  • i think theres a variety of reasons, theyve had a bad day, they’re assholes, etc

    however I’ve also made what I consider innocuous comment’s on something or replied with an answer to their questions and they’ve been offended

    I’ve also had people come into communities and be offmded as fuck. An example of the latter might be /c/fuckcars and people get offended when their very ordinary eery day activity is seen as obnoxious and they take umbrage at that and might get called out for it.

    i also have to acknowledge I sit way outside the bell curve eg I dislike people owning pet cats or dogs, i have to try very hard to not make that obvious or people get super offended…Similarly as an aethiest. My point ? my very act of me having my opinion is super offensive to some people, so then I’m the asshole if that is you.

    Somtimes people are assholes, somtimes it’s way more nuanced, sometimes people shoukd be called out on their bullshit (tolerance of intolerace)



  • that it was brutal and terrible

    https://aeon.co/essays/why-inequality-bothers-people-more-than-poverty

    But research conducted among the Ju/’hoansi in the 1950s and ’60s when they could still hunt and gather freely turned established views of social evolution on their head. Up until then, it was widely believed that hunter-gatherers endured a near-constant battle against starvation, and that it was only with the advent of agriculture that we began to free ourselves from the capricious tyranny of nature. When in 1964 a young Canadian anthropologist, Richard Borshay Lee, conducted a series of simple economic input/output analyses of the Ju/’hoansi as they went about their daily lives, he revealed that not only did they make a good living from hunting and gathering, but that they were also well-nourished and content. Most remarkably, his research revealed that the Ju/’hoansi managed this on the basis of little more than 15 hours’ work per week. On the strength of this finding, the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins in Stone Age Economics (1972) renamed hunter-gatherers ‘the original affluent society