What an utter dick.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not my cup of tea, for a number of reasons:

    1. from a security standpoint, I would have a very high probability of downloading something nasty;
    2. from a legal standpoint, authorities frown upon such behaviour;
    3. from a moral standpoint, people who produce games should be payed;
    4. from a personal standpoint, I don’t like any of their games.
    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      from a legal standpoint, authorities frown upon such behaviour;

      “the people who molest and murder children on islands wouldn’t like it if I got something for free, so I won’t”

      • Quazatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        When you live in society, you should obey the laws OR fight to change them. Pirating stuff is a weak form of protest.

          • Quazatron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            You’re clearly upset with the leadership of your country. How does piracy change anything?

            • 7101334@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              not pay money better than pay money

              I don’t really do it as a “protest”, I do it because I do not respect the law and because being a criminal is cool, but corporations are “leadership of [my] country” and anything that deprives them of any money at all is an effective protest.

              Let’s take the absolutely-totally-hypothetical example of pirating Star Trek: Strange New Worlds instead of getting a subscription for Paramount Plus. Paramount is owned by the Ellisons, and Larry Ellison is closer to “leadership of [my] country” than anyone sitting in the White House.

              so he cant get my $8 per month or whatever, that’ll show him

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago
      1. It’s not the Limewire days anymore. While it’s not risk free, if you hang about piracy for even a little bit you’ll quickly pick up an idea of who the trusted sources are.
      2. Why would you care?
      3. The ones making the games aren’t the ones you’re paying. Only the IP holders. If you’re concerned about paying the actual developers, then sticking with indie games is your only option. Not that that’s a problem; indies have come with far better quality and interesting ideas for quite some time now.
      4. Neither do I, so fair enough.
      • Quazatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago
        1. There’s always a risk, especially with such a desirable bait. If you have no problem with having your system be part of a botnet (or worse), go right ahead.
        2. I care. When you are responsible for other people, getting hit with a large fine or jail time is not an option.
        3. Part of the price goes to the developers. Not as much as in indies, but that’s life. That does not justify pirating stuff.
        4. At least we agree on something.