• criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    Lmao hard pass.

    I’m all for buying current games and remasters but $20 for a 20 year old game (that they’re releasing the editions separately) is absurd.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Meanwhile, I can go to a certain website, get the gba rom and even a romhack adding tons of QOL features and new stuff.

    Then, thanks to emulators, I can play it on any device, have cloud saves if I want, online multiplayer for free, in any language I like and for only $0.00

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Nintendo: “What are you gonna do about? Not buy it?”

    Nintendo is only doing this because people let Nintendo removed them in the ass without even a kiss and a reach around. And then they say “thank you senpai”

  • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    5 hours ago

    everything about this release is ridiculous

    20$ is way too expensive for what it is, it should honestly be 10/15$ at most
    why just fire red/leaf green? why not other pokémon games? ruby, sapphire, emerald, these have never been rereleased!
    why are all language versions separate purchases??? you couldn’t be arsed to bundle them?
    the only new feature of this release, and really the only reason one might want to use this version instead of emulating on another platform, pokémon home compatibility, is not available at launch and will be added later. come on.

  • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You ain’t going to jail for downloading a GBA game. And it is much cheaper than 20 dollars (except if you really want to play it on a switch for some reason)

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      You know there are Nintendo fans and then there are Pokemon fans. They have a reputation of not really being into games but being into everything Pokemon.

    • bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You mean the same people who in the same breath complain about the state of Pokémon and immediately follow up by saying they’re going to buy it anyway? Those people? 😅

    • Soulphite@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well… I mean, do you remember the height of Pokémon Go?

      A 2017 study estimated that in the first 148 days following its July 2016 launch, Pokémon Go was linked to 256 traffic-related deaths and over 100,000 accidents in the US due to distracted driving. These incidents, caused by users playing while driving or walking, also led to significant injuries and billions in economic damages.

      • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        As much as I think nintendo and the pokemon company are evil shits, I do believe overall pokemon go was net positive for humanity.

        The physical health benefit from all those people walking around, and the mental health benefits from said populations being more social and friendly with others won’t ever show a statistic for lives saved, but I think it’s reasonable to assume lives will be saved from extra exercise and positive social interactions.

        • alekwithak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I do agree, but it’s too bad they ran both that game and the goodwill generated by it into the ground.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I remember when there wasn’t much more to worry about besides a surge of people going outside with their phones.

        Those were the days.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because they are? How many YouTubers are playing The Hot New Thing from Nintendo right now, because they bought it? They are the ones perpetuating this removed. It’s all a feedback loop meant to suck as much money out of the public as they can.

      I can go and find at least 6 YouTubers that I subscribe to that almost always play the newest of the new thing so it’s featured on their channel. RTGame, Mo1stCr1t1kal/Penguinz0, Game Grumps, IronPineapple, VideogameDunkey, OboeShoes, hell even General Sam as much as I love his style and humor.

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    LOL I just downloaded the roms and used an emulator. There’s no way I’d re-buy for the Nintendo Switch, only because I am against their current practices. Until they abandon their virtual card system, I don’t think breaking my boycott is a smart move.

  • Guitar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I know lemmy really has a strong sentiment against Nintendo, but for me personally, I am happy about this. I think its fair to download and emulate games when there is no legal version being offered anywhere. I would also say that being offered through subscription only doesn’t change that either. But if there is a version for sale by Nintendo, I am happy to buy that instead. I don’t think piracy is justified just because you are angry at a company. If I can purchase a copy on my modern system, that is the way I’m gonna go.

      • Guitar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        No need to attack me for stating an opinion. You could try discussing the topic instead of contributing nothing to the conversation.

    • Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If a company shows no respect for its consumers by nickel and diming them for everything, then there is no reason to show a company respect by purchasing its products.

      If they re-released their entire back catalogue at reasonable prices—not locking them behind a subscription—with a commitment to letting users transfer them to future consoles without an upgrade fee, then things would be different.

      • iamthetot@piefed.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If a company shows no respect for its consumers by nickel and diming them for everything, then there is no reason to show a company respect by purchasing its products.

        Sure, but there is a difference between not giving them money, and not giving them money but getting their product anyway.

        “I don’t like your product or practices, so I’m not going to purchase it” is not the same as “I like your product but not your practices, so I’m going to pirate it.”

        Video games are not exactly a vital good like food.

        • Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Blind consumer loyalty only incentivizes Nintendo to further raise prices and make their products less consumer friendly.

          Piracy simply demonstrates a problem with supply; if Nintendo wants to solve it, the solution isn’t trying to cuts heads off of a hydra, but rather adjust prices to capture unrealized market potential.

          • iamthetot@piefed.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I did not say anything about blind consumer loyalty, so that comment feels strange in the context of this conversation.

    • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Piracy is justified because I already own those games, and they’re not backwards compatible. I’m not going to pay for the same game multiple times.

          • athatet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Even from indie devs. Many have said that if you don’t have the money to buy their game to get it and play it anyway. More eyes on it and word of mouth and whatnot.

      • Guitar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Kinda wild to claim that a purchase of a game 20 years ago justifies pirating a game now. It’s not like no one had to do any work to get it going on Switch. They had to make GBA features connect between Switch systems. But you play how you wanna play. I just don’t like all the gatekeeping a lot of people do about people buying a copy.

        • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 minutes ago

          Do you work for the billion dollar company? Weird fucking take you have portraying them as a victim

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I feel like people who were never gonna buy it no matter what the price tag was just want something to be mad at.

      • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        When I had a Wii, I bought games I had played and wanted to play on the NES when I was younger. Now I have nothing to show for it. Never again. At least with Steam, GOG, or pirating, the power is in my hands to keep those games for as long as I can. Nintendo doesn’t give me that option in any legal manner.

          • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            You’re right, because I’ve literally done it before with them and have nothing to show for it. So which of us is the fool?

      • Guitar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think this is all too common of a sentiment around here. A lot of people end up turning it into gatekeeping and it just gets old.