You deserve comparison to someone who dismissed a huge technological advancement as a fad.

Sorry, it’s what you deserve. You just really, really want to hate AI, and when people try to tell you that it has good points, you don’t want to hear it. Time will tell, I suppose.

Russian fascist, fuck off

https://mastodon.social/@nixCraft/111695037458159431

As another technologist, I have to remind everyone that unless you subscribe to some rather fringe theories, humans are also based on standard physics.

Which is math. All the way down.

That’s his point, yes. You mention gun control LLMs in a positive light on Reddit lemmy, you get absolutely dogpiled by rabid ammosexuals ai haters.

c/confidentlyincorrect

Thanks, OP, interesting read. Please don’t let the luddites get you down.

Read the article. You might learn something.

I would hope that if you give a human a text and ask them to cite facts from it they would do better than 99% correct.

That’s literally what school exams are about, isn’t it?

Token window is a problem for all llms though, that’s not easily solved, but it can be worked around to a certain extent.

GLM 4.5 is from August. Isn’t the real tl;dr that a seven month old open model, which was behind proprietary models at the time, did better than most humans would?

no u

Good grief, the irrational ai kneejerk hate in this community is insane. This seems like a perfect use case - a code base with good test coverage and well defined output expectations, where a human has guided the translation and checked the results. The human in question has saved a lot of time. And still all the comments are “hurr durr slop amirite”. SMH fucking head.

«AI bad. Give karma»