Manueverability matters less when you can fire a missile that will hit your opponent before they even know you are in the airspace.

Like I’m not trying to say the F35 is perfect, its far from it…

… But dogfights almost never happen anymore.

Air to air combat is basically # of missiles, range of missiles, threat detection/target acquisition vs stealth cpabilities.

And as we are seeing in Ukraine with drones, its very likely to become … nearly Battle Star Galactica (Newer Reboot) style realtime cyberwarfare battles.

Like, if we ever get to the point of ‘Space Battles’, they’re gonna be as much remote hacking contests as they involve any kind of physical weaponry.

So basically, its enshittification.

… but with a multi role stealth aircraft.

Its very funny to me that all the people who make all the decisions and rules around how software should work… are finding out that when everything hss software in it, well, everything has software in it.

Personally I’m waiting for more custom ROMs or whatever for cars.

Oh yeah this car is unlocked, you just actually get all the features, no need to pay Ford or GM or BMW on an perpetual basis for your heated seats.

You’re giving the guy a lot of grace.

Yep, I am.

I haven’t read every other response in the thread.

I dunno, he was able to admit a fault to me, that’s much better than I usually get in such a conversation as this.

I would assume, though I could be wrong, that by not challenging it, they either tacitly conceeded the point, or, perhaps did not even mean to say it in the way they said it, with the meaning/implication that phrasing has, as they have said English is their third language, not their first.

I didn’t expect to catch one in the wild, but evidently they just can’t help themselves.

Sure, yeah, there’s a test.

Papers please!

Mhm, I see, yes, voted for the child murdering rapist pedophile conman.

Ah.

Not a great look.

Anyway, you’e been expelled from the ‘Leftism Understander’ class due to being an obvious idiot troll, please collect your things or they will be equitably redistributed amongst the remaining students, according to their need.

Well its not like you’d have any understanding of what is or isn’t really leftist.

Here’s a hint:

Opposing massive government handouts to huge megacorporations.

Opposing biased legal standards and tax structures that massively favor the wealthy being able to accumulate more wealth, at the expense of the poor.

Opposing idiotic broad general tariffs that have historically and are currently exacerbating an ongoing Great Depression.

But, fascists love doing all those things, because they are economically illiterate and/or openly, brazenly corrupt.

And now, for more vocab, if you oppose these fascist policies, you are now anti-fascist, otherwise known as antifa.

But fascists cannot comprehend the idea that anyone could disagree with them, and also have the gall to continue being alive, so they label everyone who does as a terrorist, and have lately started executing such people in the street.

Ok.

I was talking about 2020.

The one before the one you are talking about.

Also, most ‘die hard leftists’ were disgusted by Kamala’s pro-Genocide stance… the Dems did basically everything they possibly could to obfuscate and deny and/or justify that, leftists were fucking furious about it.

And a pretty good deal of actual leftists were saying ‘all these economic numbers that politicians and the media are touting are bullshit, they’re incomplete, they are not reflective of reality’.

And well now we have all the job revisions and yep that was correct, I think the BLS has now ‘un addded’ something like 2-3 million jobs between 2022 and present.

You’re conflating liberals and leftists, which betrays that you have no idea what a leftist is.

Its liberals that fall in line with standard corporate Dem talking points.

Leftists tend to challenge and critique them.

I mean, I thought this was common knowledge, but apparently it isn’t.

I’m also an autistic data analyst type of person, so I just … actually do consume data and reports and such basically for fun.

But anyway yeah, the entire right wing narrative on this is wholly ass backwards and based on not just lies, but a literal inversion of reality.

Fascists gonna fascist.

… Well, that would an interesting survey, I… guess?

Don’t think you could do it very academically based off of trying to profile lemmy voters though, hah.

EDIT:

But also, I say this to most non English first language speakers, because it is true:

You speak English better than a considerable number of Americans who only know English, so… generally I’m very impressed that you can speak 3 languages to any extent, hahah!

I’ll admit, jailbait by definition does not fit in, so it was incorrect of me to use that word,

Thank you for seeing and saying that.

but I’ll stand by the idea that it does feel weird to me in a way that resembles liking young girls.

I mean… very broadly, yes, sure, I get that, but I feel like you have to ignore the details and context.

But I will also grant that the non actual OP image, that is of higher quality, makes it more clear that the woman is likely not a child or very young adult, than the blurrier OP image does.

Answer me this - is it perfectly fine/morally right of me to watch a porn of tall dude doing it with a very short one?

Well frankly that’s a complicated question, mostly because: What exactly do you mean by ‘very short one?’

Apologies if I am wrong but it seems like English may not be your first language, and that that might be the cause of a lot of the kerfuffle here.

If you mean an actual dwarf, someone with dwarfism, well then that, to me, becomes a discussion of basically… is it more the case that such a person basically has few other valid employment options by way of discrimination, or is it more the case that… they’re fully consenting adults, making their own choices, which they understand or are in control of?

If you mean a person who is not a dwarf, but is simply fairly short… I basically still have the same kind of answer, I guess, just with there likely being a good deal less discrimination against someone who is simply short, but not a dwarf?

Personally, as a matter of personal preference, I would not be interested in porn with dwarves, and yeah I probably would be weirded out a bit between an extreme height mismatch with non dwarves…

But ‘being weirded out’ and ‘morally endorsing or condoning something’ are not the same thing to me.

Lots of people do and enjoy things that I do not, that I find weird, but … I don’t think they’re de facto morally bad just because I find it weird.

Because I know that that all works in reverse as well: I’m into things many other people find weird or strange, but like, I’m not harming anyone.

Frankly, I just don’t like to watch any kind of porn where anyone is getting just utterly physically dominated by another person.

I don’t like porn where a guy will like, insult or or degrade or very physically forcefully slap any part of a woman, or that is styled as if its the gals boss or something… that turns me off.

But, some people are into both or either of those things.

Sorry if this is kind of a non answer, but I guess the short (lol) version would be:

Such things generally yes do make me some amount of uncomfortable, but me being uncomfortable is not the same thing as something being morally condemnable.

Are these things moral?

Basically, thats a pretty complicated question to me, and I’m honestly not totally sure how I feel about that.

EDIT: Also I did not watch that video, I’m making breakfast at the moment lol.

Yes.

https://www.visaverge.com/legal/crime-rates-lower-among-undocumented-immigrants-than-us-natives/

Evidence shows both undocumented and legal immigrants in the U.S. consistently have much lower crime and incarceration rates than natives across crime categories. This trend challenges popular beliefs and highlights the importance of accurate data for fair immigration and criminal justice policies, emphasizing immigrant contributions to safety.

So, its literally true that if you deported all native born citizens and left only immigrants, the crime rate would go down.

Thus, if you deport a subset of native born citizens, the same still applies.

So this also means that mass deporting all immigrants, regardless of their actual criminal record… well that would necessarily increase the crime rate overall.

The MAGA to Russia immigration pipeline was a thing for a while.

Maybe they’ll take them?

I am reasonably confident that you can explain Trump’s 2020 election loss by way of the disproportionate number of COVID casualties and deaths in Red areas vs Blue areas.

Basically, if Trump/MAGA had actually responded to COVID sensibly, as sensibly as Blue areas did, on average, accounting for population density…

Trump would have actually won.

But so many MAGA voters died or were disabled from voting, by COVID, that they instead lost, and then further went nuts, and didn’t believe it, and attempted an insurrection.

The funnier thing is when you try to get an LLM to do like, a report on its creators.

You can keep feeding them articles detailing the BS their company is up to, and it will usually just keep reverting to the company line, despite a preponderance of evidence that said company line is horseshit.

Like uh, try to get an LLM to give you an exact number of uh, how much will this conversation we are having, how much will that increase RAM prices in a 3 month period?

What do you think about ~95% of companies implementing ‘AI’ into their business processes reporting a 0 to negative boost to productivity?

What are the net economic damages of this malinvestment?

Give it a bunch of economic data, reports, etc.

Results are usually what I would describe as ‘comical’.

My point is you got the causation backwards.

Women generally have a stronger preference for taller men, than men have a preference for shorter women.

But you framed the entire scenario as being caused by men.

Why do men date women that’s like height of a children to them?

Its… also amazing that you yourself date someone 20cm shorter than you.

So, what, if you yourself were 5cm shorter than you are, and your partner was 5cm shorter than she is… would that be such a difference that the woman would now be ‘child sized’?

Short people do just exist, the image is an intentional joke making fun of height difference that is present in this consensual relationship.

You describe this as jailbait despite the woman looking like she’s in her upper 20s or lower 30s in age.

Like, not to be rude to the woman in the picture, but how many under 21 or under 18 girls… have forehead wrinkles, bags under their eyes?

… Women generally, statistically, indicate an ideal preference to date men who are ~21cm / ~8 inches taller than themself.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913000020

Women prefer, on average, a larger height difference between themselves and their partner (i.e. males being much taller than themselves) than men do. This effect is even more pronounced when examining satisfaction with actual partner height: women are most satisfied when their partner was 21 cm taller, whereas men are most satisfied when they were 8 cm taller than their partner.

So a roughly average height 5’4" (~1.62m) woman, on average, would ideally pick a 6’ (~1.83m) tall man, all else held equal.

By the same kinds of math, on average, men prefer to be ~8cm / ~3 inches taller than their ideal height female partner.

So a roughly average height man of 5’10" (~1.78m) would ideally prefer their gal to be 5’7" (~1.70m)

So I don’t know, you tell me why generally speaking, women ideally prefer their men to be ~8 inches taller than themself, but men ideally prefer being only ~3 inches taller than their women.

LLMs are magic at everything that you don’t understand at all, and they’re horrifically incompetent at anything you do actually understand pretty well.

At the risk of drawing the ire of people…

… I have a local LLM that I run as a primarily a coding assistant, mostly for GDScript.

I’ve never like, submitted anything as a potential commit to Godot proper.

But dear lord, the amount of shennanigans I have had to figure out just to get an LLM to even understand GDScript’s syntax and methods properly is… substantial.

They tend to just default back to using things that work in Python or JS, but… do not work or exist in GDScript.

Like one recurring quirk is they will keep trying to use ? ternary instead of if x else(if) y constructions.

That or they will constantly removed up trying to custom sorting properly, they’ll either do it syntactically wrong, or, just hallucinate various kinds of set/array methods and properties that don’t exist in GDScript.

And its a genuine stuggle to get them to comprehend more than roughly 750 lines of code at the same time, without confusing themselves.

It is possible to use an LLM to be like, hey, look at this code, help me refactor it to be more modular, or, standardize this kind of logic into a helper function… but you basically have to browbeat them with a custom prompt that tells them to stop doing all these dumb, basic things.

Even if you tell them in conversation " hey you did this wrong, heres how it actually works ", it doesnt matter, keep that conversation going and they will forget it and repeat the mistake… you have to have it contstantly present in the prompt.

The amount of babysitting and constantly telling an LLM the number of errors it is making is quite substantial.

It can be a thing that makes some sense to do in some situations, but it is extremely, extremely far away from ‘Make a game for me in Godot’, or even like ‘Make a third person camera script’.

You have to break things down into much, much more conceptually smaller chunks.

A lot of people are very stupid, and also very easily tricked/conned.

We are basically just finding all the people who pretty much already were NPCs, and now, well, they’re formalizing that.

To those people, well, the LLM probably just actually generally is more intelligent / informed than them.

George Carlin:

Imagine how stupid the average person is.

Now, realize half of all people are more stupid than that.