-=@===@=-
☆ ≈ She/Her ≈ ☆
☆ ≈ 22 Years Old ≈ ☆
-=@==@==@=-
☆ ≈ Professional Catgirl :3 ≈ ☆
-=@==@=@==@=-
☆ ≈ Lesbian | Trans Fem≈ ☆
☆ ≈Gray Ace | Gray Aro ≈ ☆
-=@==@===@==@=-
☆ ≈ Pixel Artist | Herstorian ≈ ☆
-=@==@==@=-
☆ ≈ AuDHD | PTSD ≈ ☆
☆ ≈ Disabled | Plural ≈ ☆
-=@==@==@=-
☆ ≈ Professionally Silly :3 ≈ ☆
-=@==@===@====@===@==@=-
☆ ≈ Pfp is my Cyberpunk 2077 character ≈ ☆
Yes social media is a problem, however that alone does not justify banning everyone under 21 from using the entire internet. As the person who I replied to said they wanted.
Social media is its own problem that’s needs regulations to come under control.
Also since they weren’t allowed on the internet till they were 21, those 21 year olds won’t know how to act on the internet. So now there’s 21 year olds roaming around who will need to figure all that removed out. They might get other aspects of being an adult but the internet will be completely alien.
It’s like when I saw people saying kids shouldn’t be allowed into the grocery store because someone was annoyed that kids didn’t know how to behave there yet. You just create a new and larger problem where adults don’t know how to act.
I don’t think that’s the solution though, kids (including teens to some extent) can be on the internet but it requires better parenting. It’s better to monitor what they are doing online until they are like 15 or 16, maybe 17 if you have a really good reason too. Limit screen time, be around to answer questions your kid has about what they might see.
Little kids though? Absolutely should be off the internet. Anyone under 10 shouldn’t be on the internet period in my opinion. 10-12 is kinda a gray zone to me where it’s definitely up to the parents and if they think their child is ready.
I’m a cat so yes
Sony was thinking “money me, money now, money money money, big money, money now”