What appears to be common sense to you is hardly common sense to the consumer. I choose to be more inclusive thinking of a person who might not necessarily know what 8 GB means. That’s a ton of Apple’s customers.

Just to play devil’s advocate: a smartphone is definitely a computer and has no trouble competing with older laptop CPUs in benchmarks. I see this as a difference without a distinction beyond form factor.

8GB is 💯 barely serviceable. I see this is a product for a casual user only, with excellent build quality. I don’t think it ages well when pushed.

The only potential concern I have is in considering how much casual PC market is left in the industry. I thought these users moved on to mobile, ergo leaving enthusiasts and professionals behind years ago as the remaining users. It might also cannibalize sales of their more powerful laptops because: who are the laptop buyers now? Where are they? Surely Apple did a market study, and they look set to completely dominate whatever’s left.

If I wasn’t going to use Linux, it would be Mac. Quite compelling despite the lower memory because we are in an expensive market.

They’re not alone, either. I had to downgrade my Visio just to use the features that it shipped with. I’m sure this is illegal, but no one cares unless you’re rich.

Trust me! Pay no attention to the huge heaps of cash money.

They then proceeded to divert the flight to the wrong airport once it finally did takeoff.

I love this game. It’s chill.

I’m not sure we have laws. It depends heavily on who you are whether or not they are enforced. They are more notional generalisms of what we think the law ought to be rather than what it actually is.

Definitely share your initial concern. Without strong review processes to ensure that every line of code follows the intent of the human developer, there’s no way of knowing what exactly is in there and the implications for the human users. And I’m not just talking about bugs.

They say it’s reviewed, but the temptation to blindly trust is there. In this case, developer appears to have taken some care.

The code was written by Cursor and Claude, but reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks by me. I created comparison documents, went through all queries multiple times and reviewed the logic over and over again. I also did load tests and manual regression tests, which took lots of evenings.

Let us hope so. Handle with care to ensure responsibility is not offloaded to a machine instead of a person.

Why make it so specific? Can’t we make it illegal to benefit from material, non-public information?

This is still insider trading, which ought to be illegal, but it appears to be generally accepted.

Hm, good point. Perhaps the overconfidence AI might provide is even worse than knowing you don’t know.

Mixed feelings about this. Let me play devils advocate and say that many Americans don’t have access to these resources at all. Having potentially inaccurate resources might be better than nothing, or is that worse?

Can’t wait for distros to post a disclaimer that this software is strictly intended only for use on the moon.

Counterpoint: Phone CPUs can rival yesterday’s desktops.

Fantastic. Excellent news! I would expect nothing less.

I can believe.

Luxury bones here probably thinks you need a separate weekend and events car.

Wow! Thanks for sharing that data. I had no idea.

Seed. I’d rather have at least one whole copy in a swarm versus a bunch of really fast peers that don’t have the complete files.