Maybe, but I think for some people with powerful PCs and local AIs, this may be the norm.

By the way, what if the AI could copy this image of the cosplayer and reproduce it as if the person was communicating with his ideal that he saw in that girl? Maybe it’s a great way for unhealthy people to satisfy themselves?

Although no, it sounds silly, but I think some people do this.

But thanks for the explanation, I’m a complete ignoramus in this.

At that time, people did not yet suspect that their creativity and soul were just patters that could be copied thanks to a stable database and sufficient computing power.

Oh, that’s so cute.

I’ve already realized that online dating is not dating, it’s a kind of shop, seriously, instead of finding real people, people can successfully communicate with AI on a computer, it’s a perfect product, much better than a real person, isn’t it? For many years I tried to find at least someone on the Internet, but there, as I said, people consider each other something that can be used, thrown away and replaced in half an hour or even five minutes. In the early Internet, everything was not so bad, but the further it went, the worse it became.

He showed himself to be a real man.

It reminds me of a scene from a movie or series that I watched, there was something very similar.

Let them do what they want, I can’t wait for them to blow up half of the universe and themselves at the same time.

I think you should still read the I have no mouth… by Harlan Ellison.

What about that you can’t tell if water is water or pixels?

Here’s the problem: there will come a time when AI will become impossible to control, and 2027 may only be a signal for further problems.

If, in your opinion, autonomy means to think like a human being and to have so-called freedom, which can hardly be called freedom, given that your thoughts, desires, and actions are predictable mechanisms given to you by nature, then you are not quite right, even man is a rather primitive animal by nature, and his entire development is conditioned by the variety of information that he received during life and genetically inherited it. And perhaps he reinterpreted some concepts a little differently, and that’s it. In the case of AI, it can become autonomous in its own way, having its own built-in mechanisms, like humans, other animals, or even trees, depending on how a person tunes these mechanisms, but, unfortunately, given human nature, one should not hope for anything good.

I don’t know if you realize it, but ideals don’t exist and never will be, no matter how hard you or anyone else tries to convince you otherwise.

And what did you expect? people are stupid animals. But if you are offended by this, you can look at the concept of stupidity from the other side.

I completely agree, I think nothing in this world will surprise me anymore.

The word “garbage” is also appropriate, although in the case of AI, it’s not exactly garbage, given the quality of content created by AI this year, which is almost indistinguishable from human-made, but I can’t find the right words, so I call it top-quality excrement.

This is just an example. I compared generation AIs to Lego constructors, only they can assemble themselves as if they were assembled by a person, thanks to prompts. This is of dubious value.

In what sense?

What it can’t do is make authentic organic music. And sure, llms can make it "seem* organic, but you can tell. At least for now. I myself always research artists of music I listen to so its not an issue, and I can tell for now when something is fake.

Okay, I think I’ll unfriend him today and forget about him. In any case, thanks for the advice.

In fact, the AI can simply copy the artist’s soul and even enhance it, which turns out to be very easy thanks to high-quality models and accurate prompts.

I also used to believe in the soul of the artist, but, unfortunately, the delicious cake was stolen.