Slippery nipples for everyone!
It’s crazy that the reddit/Lemmy hivemind opposes the most mild regulations on predatory app stores and the argument is well this law is fine but it COULD slippery nipples our way to a much worse law that is completely different in its form and intent than this law.
I guess you can take the corporate surveillance out of reddit, but you can’t take the libertarian instincts out of the redditors.
Yeah you need a bunch of “optional” records SPF DMARC DKIM PTR (if possible)
The frustrating part is all the simps telling you that E2EE makes it safe, nah the same way they can log the IP of a user when asked, they can use the JavaScript they send you when you open protonmail to upload whatever emails they want access to, or your to key.
If you want E2EE use GPG, otherwise you’re just pretending.
Self hosted my mail for decades, the only issue i’ve had is Hotmail/outlook, who have blacklisted my IP with no way to unblock it.
Gmail is pretty good
Yeah using a public ledger would have saved the FBI having to get a warrant, especially given how in bed crypto-exchanges are with Trump
They litterally gave information they were legally required to
E2EE stops them from being forced to turn over the emails themselves
Except it doesn’t, E2EE in browser is pointless, they send your browser the code that does the dycription, they can just as easily send your browser code that does decyption & uploads the contents to themselves.
Yes doing actual E2EE emails is harder because both ends need to use an email client and configure it to do encryption, but for amost all scenarios protonmail is no more technically secure than any other webmail provider.
| Scenario | Gmail | protonmail |
|---|---|---|
| Legally required to hand over your emails | can comply | can comply the next time you use the account |
| Datacenter breach | emails encrypted at rest | emails encrypted at rest |
| Persistent threat within supplier | can read your emails | requires code injection capability |
I think offering per-user encryption that makes it harder for the company to data mine your emails is good, I just wish people would stop believing companies selling you “secure solutions”.
In this case defendtheatlantaforest would have been more secure if they used any free email provider and GPG, yet there’s a cult-of-produce around protonmail as if it’s offering you a level of security that it can’t.
The good news shows are the morning shows at the weekend but they also end up basically being ads for small businesses that have an in with the producers.
There are a couple of decent YouTube good news shows I think though
So a law that is deliberately done in the least invasive way, sets a president to push invasive and manipulative shit?
Can you explain how? Like in any way? When it’s clearly going to reduce the manipulation of kids.
Sorry it wasn’t you it was someone else who’s also worked themselves into a hysteria about this bill that doesn’t require age verification: https://lemmy.world/post/43924616/22534958
No, people who don’t confidently understand reality are.
You litterally just claimed you don’t send user-agent strings to servers, it’s not surprising some dumber than AI level takes can get you worked up about a bill doing things it doesn’t do.
They still send user-agent strings.
Are they worth it vs just redirecting the input/output?
you don’t focus the government to track the speech of everyone through a slow-boil process to make it socially inevitable that our fucking retinal scans are uploaded to a central government database that tracks everything we post online.
Lmao have you actually read what the law actually says.
Lmao Lemmy users proving they are in fact dumber than AI and when confronted with a mass hallucination will call everyone a fed 🤣.
The more deranged you post, the more I’m convinced restricting 13 y/o s access to the Internet (that this law doesn’t do) is a great idea.
Lemmy/redditors can be dumb, the article actually made it very clear the law doesn’t require verification and isn’t that big of a deal.
So you know what astroturfing means?
I’m clearly not presenting myself as a grassroots campaign for something, I’m just laughing at the reddit/Lemmy hivemind’s collective hallucination on this.
How is disagreeing with the hysteria “astroturfing”?
If you’re going to call everyone not on board with your fear cult a bot you could at least stick to your claim instead of changing them.
More AI fearslop
And yet here you are fighting to defend corporations from regulations, somehow thinking you’re not on the side of facism. 🤷♂️
Same but a ubuntu-derivative instead of Arch.
I don’t want to think about my server, but I do sometimes want the latest and greatest app on my laptop.