Like many claim satire is dead because it is indistinguishable from real news, this makes me think shitposting will suffer the same fate.

Now where can I buy this?

What about phase? We could amplify or destroy.

Fucking Debra.

No, sorry, I got the spelling wrong. It slobluntu. My mistake. A portmanteau of slobbery blunt to you.

Thats when the person to your right hands you a slobbery spliff during puff-puff-pass.

Can you tell me more about the pegging? I tried to google it, and well now my wife wants to have a talk after work. That’s never a good sign.

The grid could under real leadership. Your vampire squid parasitic infection is the problem here.

Capitalist exploitation is a natural cause? That’s a wild take.

And for everything that is not solvable in an ER visit, go and die somewhere out of sight.

Fiiiind another race.

Bad example. In the US it’s super cool to deny care for dollars. Illness and death are built into the system from for profit hospitals to health insurance and pharma pricing.

Edit: Downvote all you like, but Luigi isn’t a folk hero without reason.

3 part answer:

1. Yes. Many are deeply morally and ethically good people. I know a few personally. They view defending the indefensible as the price to pay for society to have a free, fair and functional justice system. They are true believers in what the legal system aspires to be, even when it doesn’t always live up to its promise. They know a bad guy going free is harmful, but must be balanced against innocents being victimized by a vengeful society as more harmful. They love to lose when the evidence is compelling against their client knowing justice was served and the sometimes severe punishments are applied to a human being with their conscience clean.

2. No. Well, not always. There are shitty people everywhere. Criminal Defence can pay really well and pay and prestige attracts more than a few self serving dark triad types.

3. Same goes for judges. I am generally fond of European courts and Canadian courts where Judges are often appointed from lists created by comittees of law societies or their equivalent. Their peers tend to select the best legal minds among them as nominees. We tend to score very high in comparative analyses. Contrast this with the US election of judges and political appointees of Supreme Court Justices and, well, you can see dumpster fires of a bad system everywhere. Elected people are unduly influenced by the pressures of their electorate or campaign financiers. This tends to result in vengeful false convictions of innocents and disproportional persecution of underclasses, political or economic motivated injustices, and well heeled crooks and creeps going free.

I’ll take your brain to another dimension. Pay close attention.

It’s a digital replica.

A heart attack? Your manager should get more exercise and eat a diet rich in iron, folate, protein and fibre and scantily clad women. Like beans. See above for a serving guide

That’s exactly what a bot would say. Ask me how I know. ;)

You got that backwards. “Mom doesn’t know what an anal prolapse is.”

Me cave exploring and thowing a glow stick down the hole.

“Wow, déja-vue. I feel like my ex-wife and I have been here before.”

Giant rock-monster fleshlight.

Why is this NSFW? Everyone loves beans.