I’m still in the research phase of switching to Linux and don’t know if this concern is reasonable. I’m not tech savvy. I’m comfortable in the windows ecosystem and could use the dos prompt fine when they used it. I played with QBasic and C++ when I was younger and have built a few computers but that was a couple decades+ ago.
My concern is dealing with malware. I know that Linux has less issues with malware than Windows but, as I understand it, that’s primarily because it has a comparatively small market share. I feel like I’m getting into Linux just as it’s getting more popular and that it will get worse if the EU moves away from Microsoft because they will most likely adopt some form of Linux as their new standard. More less tech savvy people like me moving to Linux makes it a juicier target for people who create and use malicious software. It’s not a reason to stay with Windows but is it a reasonable concern? Are there sufficient tools for people who don’t really know what they’re doing to be reasonably secure on Linux and will they keep up if the threat profile expands as Linux picks up more users?


I’m closer to the average user than someone who has built a fortress. I use Firefox with ublock, ghostery, and privacy badger. I use the free tier of proton vpn. I run avast daily and malwarebytes weekly.
I think that I should already be close to best practices but I’m not sure how changing OS will affect that. I’m not really worried about being targeted for anything. I don’t think that I really do much risky beyond the occasional torrent or downloading a patch for a game. I get games primarily from gog, don’t open strange emails or click strange links, and use a password manager to generate secure passwords. One of the things that I’m most unsure about is keeping everything updated. Microsoft manages keeping everything updated for the most part on Windows and the last time I needed to find a driver anywhere except from Microsoft it came on a 3.5" floppy.
I use my computer primarily for single player gaming, discord, and fediverse sites. I need a spreadsheet and word processer, I use open office for that right now. I do financial and work related things on a different device.
Yet another very lengthy comment. I hope you will find it worth reading.
Wow, that’s very insightful. Thank you for the effort!
If you allow me, I wish to provide some feedback and -if applicable- give pointers on how some of that translates to Linux.
That’s probably true, but you’re definitely upholding excellent practices. Most people I know don’t even practice a fraction of that 😅. So mad props for that!
FWIW, I will assume for now that you haven’t delved into Windows Registry (or stuff like HotCakeX) for the sake of hardening. Which, to be clear, is absolutely fine. But is worth noting for the eventual mapping to a suitable distro.
You can just continue doing these.
Unfortunately, I’m not aware on how we would translate this responsibly. This could be on me, though. Granted, the situation on Linux is different from how it is at Windows. Anyhow, as a non-expert, the furthest I came would boil down to:
It will 😜. Look into the others comments for a healthy amount of pointers on this.
I’m glad to hear that. It would otherwise complicate things a lot.
You should be fine as long as they’re from trusted sources.
Unrelated to the rest of my commentary, but this is an excellent choice! You got great taste.
Keep this up 👍.
So, the gist is that as long as you’re installing stuff from a repository, then upgrading your whole system should be a pretty straightforward, streamlined and seamless experience. Heck, it can even be automated if you want. The following is worth pointing out, though:
So, if that was your experience on Windows, then I’m somewhat optimistic that you’d be more than fine on Linux. FWIW, drivers and whatnot are mostly found within the Linux kernel itself. Thus, making Linux a very smooth experience; your drivers simply receive the updates whenever an update to the kernel has been applied. Though, while rare, exceptions do exist. And they’re quite notorious:
Nothing out of the ordinary. Most of those translate pretty easily to Linux:
.deband.rpminstall files, so nothing’s actually preventing you from installing it. FWIW, if you’re not necessarily tied to OpenOffice, then perhaps the likes of LibreOffice (and many others) are worth mentioning.Good job on compartmentalizing your activities across multiple devices!
Fam, as this has become an absolute unit of a comment, please feel free to dismiss as you feel like and only engage with the parts you want. If you’ve come this far, then I’d like to express my appreciation: Thank you!
To be clear, it seemed to me that you would prefer this. Which is why I specifically targeted gratis options. But please let me know if you’re willing to shell out. ↩︎
Note that this might not be setup correctly OOTB. Consider checking out this entry within its documentation. ↩︎
This is actually widely reported. See e.g. this reddit thread or see this discussion on the Linux Mint forum ↩︎
Labeling a terminal-based tool as the easier option might seem counter intuitive at first, but makes sense when you notice that it can scan folders. Which, makes it possible to move all flagged files (by ClamAV or otherwise) to a folder in which they can all be scanned in one go ↩︎
This can sometimes be a convoluted term as it means different things depending on the context. Here, I use it to mean production-ready as per the developer of said software. ↩︎
In which it basically freezes and skips any version in between. Security updates are backported, though. So, you’re not necessarily unsafe/insecure and/or at risk. ↩︎
Many reasons exists for this, but an oversimplification -for the sake of brevity- would be due to its improved security. ↩︎