So, uh… I think you’re confidently incorrect on pretty much all of that.
When your browser requests a web page it doesn’t report what extensions you have installed. It does report plugins but those are not extensions. My report says about 66% of browsers have the same plugins as me.
Ad blockers are a special case. Your browser doesn’t tell the server you have Ubo installed but the server can detect an ad blocker if you’re not requesting additional advertising related resources.
Most of the other user end configurations aren’t really going to effect your fingerprint either.
It turns out that what I said earlier about intentional randomisation is correct. Firefox Resist Fingerprinting (RFP) which is enabled by LibreWolf randomises canvas results, so you’re going to be unique for each fingerprinting attempt. That’s just as good as being common.
In my own case, my biggest weakness is the fonts I have installed as reported by my browser. I might look into that.
Oh fair enough, I’ll re-examine some of that information. I don’t think I’m completely wrong. Advice on not installing extensions to avoid adding to the fingerprint comes from the official Mullvad FAQ. The philosophy of making all users look the same to blend in is something inherited from Tor Browser.
Mullvad also uses resist fingerprinting, yes canvas is unique every attempt. The EFF cover your tracks test doesn’t penalise you for it, if you’re coming up as unique there it’s not because of that (some tests out there do though and Mullvad fails them). Having a randomised canvas itself may count as one data point I guess.
So, uh… I think you’re confidently incorrect on pretty much all of that.
When your browser requests a web page it doesn’t report what extensions you have installed. It does report plugins but those are not extensions. My report says about 66% of browsers have the same plugins as me.
Ad blockers are a special case. Your browser doesn’t tell the server you have Ubo installed but the server can detect an ad blocker if you’re not requesting additional advertising related resources.
Most of the other user end configurations aren’t really going to effect your fingerprint either.
It turns out that what I said earlier about intentional randomisation is correct. Firefox Resist Fingerprinting (RFP) which is enabled by LibreWolf randomises canvas results, so you’re going to be unique for each fingerprinting attempt. That’s just as good as being common.
In my own case, my biggest weakness is the fonts I have installed as reported by my browser. I might look into that.
Oh fair enough, I’ll re-examine some of that information. I don’t think I’m completely wrong. Advice on not installing extensions to avoid adding to the fingerprint comes from the official Mullvad FAQ. The philosophy of making all users look the same to blend in is something inherited from Tor Browser.
Mullvad also uses resist fingerprinting, yes canvas is unique every attempt. The EFF cover your tracks test doesn’t penalise you for it, if you’re coming up as unique there it’s not because of that (some tests out there do though and Mullvad fails them). Having a randomised canvas itself may count as one data point I guess.