• Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    but the app itself isn’t fake.

    When someone calls a plastic rolex a fake, they don’t mean that it isn’t a watch

    • comador @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      lmao. I’ve been around FOSS long enough to remember when GIMP was considered a rip off of Photoshop much in the same light and Blender was a Maya rip off early on.

      NP++ for Mac works, I’m running ut and it isn’t plastic fake anymore than GIMP or Blender are. They fucked up in using the name though, it’s not an official release.

      • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        The fake watch can probably tell the time, too.

        As far as I know GIMP and Blender never tried to masquerade as Photoshop and Maya.

        Using someone else’s branding to deceive users isn’t just a little “fuck up”. One does not impersonate another project by accident.

      • finalarbiter@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        GIMP never called itself Photoshop. The problem here is this clone is using the trademarked name and lying about official association with Ho, not that it has similar functionality to Notepad++.

        Also, Blender predates Maya by at least a couple years, so not sure what you’re going on about there.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a bit odd, considering Blender was released in 1994 (development can be traced back to 1987), while Maya was released in 1998…

        And even if the dates were reversed, I didn’t have any trouble distinguishing the word “Blender” from the word “Maya”, nor telling their logos apart