• Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    7 days ago

    I swear people do not understand the point of what microsoft does.

    There isn’t a team tasked with making teams worse. They’re tasked with extracting all possible value out of their product. Part of that value is infromation like where you are, what you’re doing, what you’re talking about, what you search for, what you actually do for your job, who is around you, what they talk about, where they are, what they are doing, what they search for, and what they do for their job and how everyone spends their money.

    All of this is incredibly valuable data to governments, businesses and private individuals that want to advertise, suppress dissenting political voices, enhance useful dissenting political voices, and otherwise manipulate global influence.

    They just don’t want you to think about declining any permissions, triggering regulatory action, or switching to another platform.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s true. Their mission is not explicitly to make it worse, but to continually maximize value at all costs. Eventually, software usability has to be one of the costs.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I thought LinkedIn was for 50 year old middle managers to post their opinions on the evils of socialism.

    • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The various news sites out there that want to spread their own version of influence and generate their own revenue take this kind of information and use it to see how you click on things, what drives your engagement, what you will go on to share with others, and how you talk about all of it. It’s all tied together.

      Big money interests run basically everything in this world. We are just cattle, we will always be just cattle. I’m in countless databases like all of you, and we’re all fucked by the system we think we might some day to cheat our way above the other rats. The noose is tied tight though… there’s not much room left to struggle. It’s too late to escape it. Palantir and Flock are here to close the loop and they aren’t going anywhere, even if the street cameras are likely to be hidden in the future and more tamper proof rather than obvious to the public. Doesn’t matter if the laws change to ban it or you can convince local government to not get involved with it - it’s way too easy to hide cameras with modern technology. Just give it time and your credit score and auto insurance will incorporate flock data ;)

        • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          They’re already paying all the manufacturers for the driver telemetry anyway, probably through third party brokers because everything must be obfuscated.

          I think they like having multiple layers of confirmation that way if one is regulated away for some reason like ‘privacy’ or ‘technically anyone could be driving’ then they have fallbacks and legal deniability for the data being inherently flawed.

  • Fokeu@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    They’ve crossed the line a long long time ago. All microslop products are straight up unusable.

  • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wonder if the team that is tasked with making teams worse has team meetings with the whole team on teams.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    My employer has the usual setup of M365 enterprise shit running on Dell laptops.

    Fortunately we devs are able to “dual boot” to run Linux on our machines, since our product is an embedded Linux system. (has anybody seen my Windows partition btw? I can’t even find anything NTFS formatted, whoopsie!)

    All that background info is just so I can pay Microsoft a compliment, even if it has asterisks all over it:

    The entire Microsoft suite works just fine in a browser, and in LibreWolf too! I do typically add some permissions for those sites for convenience, since librewolf is privacy/tracking hardened (firefox fork) out of the box. I use Teams and Outlook every day, and occasionally will drop a file into OneDrive or edit something in MS Office. I don’t write many office-format documents though, so I’m more likely to be in LibreOffice or a PDF viewer just reading a doc.

    You know how in media streaming and gaming there’s that balance of whether it is more convenient to be a paying customer versus pirate everything?

    Microsoft’s stuff is literally better to use in Linux. Even if I need to test the Windows build of something, a VM is SO much more convenient. And I’m not even logged into the microsoft shit on that. If I need something from OneDrive, I go to the browser there too.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Employees arent the ones paying for Teams, so why would they care? Teams could openly market itself as remote work surveillance tool for employers and they’d gobble that shit up.

  • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s a web client. I’ll use that from now on if I have to. Should I use any particular browser that prevents access to WiFi details?

    I wonder if the web client can be bookmarked to my desktop with the Teams icon.

    • Kaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve been using web client for work because the app takes seemingly over 50% of my laptop’s resources. Went from waiting 2-3 minutes for Teams to open at the beginning of the day to 10 seconds. Highly recommend.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      firefox or a fork of it, but I would be surprised if teams could read wifi info even in chrome. this is about when you install it as a desktop app, so that it can collect more data and consume more memory than it would otherwise.

  • curiousfurbytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I had the unfortunate requirement to use Teams for about 3 months. I seriously cannot comprehend how a business exec has the audacity to approve it to be used as a company’s chat, specially with Slack being the other obvious option, as well as the few open source and self hosted ones. I really wish Teams was nuked. The worst experience I have ever had with a software.

  • lasta@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is what I gathered on the subject, feel free to correct if anything is wrong:

    The WiFi tracking works by scanning for nearby WiFi networks, identifying which routers are nearby and their signal strengths, matching those against their database of known WiFi access points, and using that data to estimate your location.

    For now the feature will be off by default, first has to be enabled by your company, and then the user has to opt in for it to be used.

    For those who are required to use Microsoft products, it can by bypassed by using a wired Ethernet connection and not using Teams on any devices using a wireless connection.

    Edit: As @lividweasel@lemmy.world pointed out, Microsoft is not using WiFi positioning systems to determine location, but rather updating your location to “in the office” or not depending on whether your device is connected to one of the organization’s WiFi SSIDs.

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      That doesn’t at all match the documentation.

      The organization will configure a list of Wi-Fi SSIDs. When your device connects to one of those, the Teams location would be updated to “in the office”.

      That’s it. No complex triangulation, no pinpoint locating. Just “are you connected to the office network or not”.

      Also, if you don’t want to be tracked in this way, just don’t participate. If your organization sets a policy to opt you in automatically, click the option to opt out. If they give the offer to opt in, just don’t.

      I know it’s hip to hate on Microsoft, but we should at least discuss things based on the truth, not wild assumptions and misinformation.

      • lasta@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Thanks for the clarification. I wrongly assumed Microsoft was using Wi-Fi positioning systems (which is used for geolocation, just not in this particular case) instead of reading their documentation.

        I’ll update the comment.

        I also don’t think most workplaces are going to punish you for opting out of this feature even if organizational policy requires it to be enabled.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Please add _nomap to the end of your SSID (the name of your wifi network) if you don’t want Google to use it in their tracking mechanisms.

      Please add _optout anywhere in your SSID if you don’t want Microsoft to use it in their tracking mechanisms.

      If your SSID is Network change it to Network_optout_nomap

      Ridiculous as fuck, but that’s what they came up with. I have no idea what other services use to block their Wifi collectors, but these 2 are very prominent anyway.

    • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      So basically the same every Android phone does. Google has done this kind of tracking since 2007

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes but now it reports to your employer.

        I don’t quite get the uproar for this.

        The issue is your employees trying to force RTO. Whether this goes through or is cancelled - your employer will still want to track your RTO.

        The only solution, if you are privileged enough, is to work somewhere else.

        I did. I make less but I have more free time, and less stress. My employer doesn’t give a fuck where I am so long as the work gets done.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I look forward to this feature being deployed in hospitals. It’s going to fail so hard and generate so many tickets.

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Why?

        Is it important that their team’s location be up to date?

        Surely a hospital has better methods for tracking independently of teams

        • redsand@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Lots of people will skim or hear about the feature and think something is broken when it works as poorly as intended. Hospitals have lots of people, lots of APs(some move), weird layouts and signal propogation. Great place to confuse. Colleges have the potential to be funnier.

  • lumettaria@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Tenant admins will decide whether to enable it and require end-users to opt-in.”

    If you require someone to opt-in, they’re no longer “opting in”