Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square279linkfedilinkarrow-up1711arrow-down134
arrow-up1677arrow-down1external-linkLinux lays down the law on AI-generated code, says yes to Copilot, no to AI slop, and humans take the fall for mistakes — after months of fierce debate, Torvalds and maintainers come to an agreementwww.tomshardware.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square279linkfedilink
minus-squareSenal@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day agoOk, so there are 70-81 copilots, github is one of them. Why is github copilot a different thing in the context of the reply that was being responded to ?
minus-squarelepinkainen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoCopilot is the harness, Claude and GPT are the models Copilot is by far the worst harness of all the major players
minus-squareSenal@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·21 hours agoYes, i get that, copilot is like opencode or cursor, though perhaps with less general access to models. There was a reply Copilot? You mean the AI with terms of service that are in bold and explicit: “for entertainment purposes only”? followed by I suppose GitHub Copilot is meant, which is a different thing. i was asking why github copilot is different in that context.
Ok, so there are 70-81 copilots, github is one of them.
Why is github copilot a different thing in the context of the reply that was being responded to ?
Copilot is the harness, Claude and GPT are the models
Copilot is by far the worst harness of all the major players
Yes, i get that, copilot is like opencode or cursor, though perhaps with less general access to models.
There was a reply
followed by
i was asking why github copilot is different in that context.