So, it seems like PieFed is becoming a real alternative to lemmy.

What are the differences between these two? From a tech perspective, and also morality/ethics, if you want. Any differences in vision for these services?

Say whatever is on your mind. I want to know.

On which one should we put our weight?

Edit: I will leave this post here, which is a post by one of the devs of Lemmy that enumerates some of the things Lemmy 1.0 has. Lemmy 1.0 seems to be already in alpha stage and is already testable. The feature selection does look fantastic. Here is the post I am referring to: https://lemmy.ml/post/40744781

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is still important to support the better project

    If everyone went to the “best” instance it would crash it…

    Like, you do realize the whole “decentralized” thing is why most of us are here, right?

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      OP is talking about the software all of the instances run on, not the individual servers themselves.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would say that having a variety of software options also helps keep one party from having too much power, which is the main focus of federation. It’s not as important as having a variety of instances, but we can have both, so why not take advantage of it?