• emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do not see anything to be angry or disappointed about?

    Verification badge was good, the dumb thing Twitter did was throw it away by letting anyone pay for it.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah it was not good. Domain names already do that and are accessible to all at all times with full transparency and decentralization. Bluesky is literally regressing.

      Even mastodon’s verification system is better than checkmarks.

  • einkorn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bluesky, the decentralized social network […]

    Were only one instance exist or did I miss something?

    • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As I understand it, the protocol has the ability to decentralize built in. But the technical requirements are prohibitively high to the point only large businesses or corps could afford to do it. I also believe (someone correct me) the company hasn’t switched on the functionality yet.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The biggest thing is that you need to be manually authorized by them for federation. They will only ever federate with servers that arent serious enough competition to lead to democratization of the overall network.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, PDS federation is fully open now.

          They’re also actively supporting development of 3rd party appviews and relays.