Hope Valve loses and something changes. Valve has been getting away with this bullshit for way too long because people like them and therefore give them a pass on all of their shitty behaviour.
At the expense of everyone’s privacy even if you don’t participate in the loot box economy, because you know the laws won’t be written for only if you access them it’ll be a blanket requirement. That’s not the way to get rid of loot boxes.
The line between banning loot boxes and banning games like Balatro is a very fine one, with a need to specify that what is being banned is monetary transactions to access lottery pools.
That kind of accuracy and genuine intent is not what is currently present in lawmaking in most countries.
I hope I’m wrong about this, but I don’t think I am.
I don’t think the line is that fine in that case, considering all random mechanics in Balatro give ephemeral rewards that only last until the end of a run, which is an isolated instance of a game with limited playtime, those mechanics cannot be paid for with real money, the resulting rewards cannot be sold for real money or traded with other players, and generally cannot affect any other players in any way, not even visually through cosmetics.
As far as I know, Balatro is only really being targeted because it’s stylized after poker, with the enforcement having no actual understanding of what the gameplay looks like.
I think at bigger risk from actual laws would be MMORPGs where you can get random loot drops from enemies/chests, and those also tend to have markets where people grind valuable drops and use in-game trading to transfer them to other players in exchange for real money.
That’s the issue! I’m not saying Balatro is gambling in any sense, I’m just saying that people incorrectly perceived it that way due to the connection to poker.
By legislating them to be illegal and then fining developers that don’t comply. Sliding scale fines that wipe out the cost benefit of the loot boxes in the first place would suffice.
But it’s definitely not by compromising everyone’s privacy and forcing them to identify themselves because the government wants to be able to identify everyone everywhere at all times and uaing children as the excuse like they always do.
It isn’t always that simple. It could lead to age verification requirements
You seem to be under the impression that gambling is illegal only for children in New York, but that’s not what’s happening here, gambling is illegal in New York for all ages.
Yeah, I didn’t think about that. That is kind of a nightmare scenario. I still stand by what I said. Now the question is, do I trust legislation to make a good decision that doesn’t fuck over everyone in the end? And if so, do I trust a multi-billion dollar company to not do some horrendous malicious compliance?
What shitty behavior? A new version of Counter Strike? Literally having a platform that sells games and isn’t beholden to shareholders? A platform that isn’t selling our data or purposely made to game more money out of people?
You click buy, that’s on you. Have an addiction then go get some fucking help and stop blaming everyone else.
Hope Valve loses and something changes. Valve has been getting away with this bullshit for way too long because people like them and therefore give them a pass on all of their shitty behaviour.
deleted by creator
implement age verification on games with loot boxes. watch sales crash. stop making loot box funded games.
At the expense of everyone’s privacy even if you don’t participate in the loot box economy, because you know the laws won’t be written for only if you access them it’ll be a blanket requirement. That’s not the way to get rid of loot boxes.
What is the way to get rid of loot boxes?
Straight up ban them. No age gate, no nothing. Just no more loot boxes. It’s worse than a fucking casino and those should be banned too.
The line between banning loot boxes and banning games like Balatro is a very fine one, with a need to specify that what is being banned is monetary transactions to access lottery pools.
That kind of accuracy and genuine intent is not what is currently present in lawmaking in most countries.
I hope I’m wrong about this, but I don’t think I am.
Well that applies to far more than this subject.
I don’t think the line is that fine in that case, considering all random mechanics in Balatro give ephemeral rewards that only last until the end of a run, which is an isolated instance of a game with limited playtime, those mechanics cannot be paid for with real money, the resulting rewards cannot be sold for real money or traded with other players, and generally cannot affect any other players in any way, not even visually through cosmetics.
As far as I know, Balatro is only really being targeted because it’s stylized after poker, with the enforcement having no actual understanding of what the gameplay looks like.
I think at bigger risk from actual laws would be MMORPGs where you can get random loot drops from enemies/chests, and those also tend to have markets where people grind valuable drops and use in-game trading to transfer them to other players in exchange for real money.
That’s the issue! I’m not saying Balatro is gambling in any sense, I’m just saying that people incorrectly perceived it that way due to the connection to poker.
By legislating them to be illegal and then fining developers that don’t comply. Sliding scale fines that wipe out the cost benefit of the loot boxes in the first place would suffice.
Don’t know. That’s not my specialty.
But it’s definitely not by compromising everyone’s privacy and forcing them to identify themselves because the government wants to be able to identify everyone everywhere at all times and uaing children as the excuse like they always do.
You seem to be under the impression that gambling is illegal only for children in New York, but that’s not what’s happening here, gambling is illegal in New York for all ages.
deleted by creator
Well, not all forms. The State of New York runs a lottery itself, for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Lottery
Yeah, I didn’t think about that. That is kind of a nightmare scenario. I still stand by what I said. Now the question is, do I trust legislation to make a good decision that doesn’t fuck over everyone in the end? And if so, do I trust a multi-billion dollar company to not do some horrendous malicious compliance?
… and I’m not going to answer these questions. :|
deleted by creator
I wonder if they ask everyone for ID. My account is old enough to drink.
What shitty behavior? A new version of Counter Strike? Literally having a platform that sells games and isn’t beholden to shareholders? A platform that isn’t selling our data or purposely made to game more money out of people?
You click buy, that’s on you. Have an addiction then go get some fucking help and stop blaming everyone else.