• FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s a way to infer the data without having to create some human engineered and fragile detection method.

        The problem of dealing with unreliable signal transmission (i.e. a CNN’s error rate at inferring the data based on their imaging) is well explored. A CNN that fails to correctly read some measurable percentage of time is not much different than a wireless data transmission on a noisy channel.

        You solve the problem by encoding the signal so that you can check the data as it comes in to discover and correct for errors. A simple example would be writing the data 3 times so that you could compare the inference on each of the 3 places where the data is written. Modern error checking algorithms can do a lot better than this, space-wise.

        CNNs can be trained to have a very high accuracy rate on these kinds of image recognition tasks (especially with a limited symbol set) and they can tune their error correction around the CNN’s error rates so the net result would be a clean and error check and corrected output.

        Not to mention that CNNs may not be required of future persons with better imaging technology.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Oh, look, it’s the latest mass storage tech that will never be commercially produced!